Search for: "Petty v. Petty"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
193 Misc.2d 432 751 N.Y.S.2d 351 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:58 am
Petty, 2008 Ohio 5962, 2008 Ohio App. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
CAAF apparently chose to open the door to the Supremes for Petty Officer Wilson.Along with the three summary affirmances in Coleman, Wilson, and Matospacheco came a summary reversal in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:43 am
The loss of benefits, even if temporarily, is not always a "petty slight" under Title VII. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 5:59 am
See Petty, 591 F.2d at 617; accord Ciralsky v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
An 1888 Supreme Court decision, Callan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:13 pm
Neyer Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati TORTS; IMMUNITY: Claim arising from photos taken of decedents in Hamilton County morgue without families' consent 07a0064p.06 2007/02/16 Petty v. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Oklahoma City and Mayer v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:34 am
“A false representation in a disclosure statement may constitute active concealment” (Pettis v Haag, 84 AD3d 1553, 1554 [2011] [citations omitted]). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Nobody marched up to Grendell and said "you're a petty, totalitarian thug" to his face. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Nobody marched up to Grendell and said "you're a petty, totalitarian thug" to his face. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
Devoted follower(s) of the Blog may recall my post on the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in Sands v. [read post]
