Search for: "Phillip Pro"
Results 261 - 280
of 581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
Phillips, which argued in essence that slavery was all that bad, as well as books like Thomas Dixon's The Clansman, which argued that Reconstruction was a period of rule by corrupt former slaves and their Northern allies. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
” The employer complained that it faced a “single-sum, class-wide verdict from which each purported class member, damaged or not, will receive a pro-rata portion of the jury’s one-figure verdict. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
(Image used with permission) I’m pleased to report that my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic student Ashley Phillips and I just filed an amicus brief last week on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:13 am
Read this recent FINRA arbitrationCase In PointIn a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in October 2013, public customer Claimant Phillips representing himself pro se alleged the following causes of action against Respondent Chase Investment Services: breach of fiduciary duty,misrepresentations,omission of facts,failure to supervise,negligence, andfailure to execute. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 671 (1950)). [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 1:22 am
My entry for the prize for the most unsurprising allegation of 2015 was the uncannily similar complaints that emanated from a number of Conservative MPs who claimed that the BBC’s reporting of the general election had been overtly pro-Labour (fat lot of good it did them, one might opine). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:56 pm
A jury ruled in the former intern’s favor on claims for quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliation under the NYSHRL and the NYCHRL, as well as defamation. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm
"Judge Goodman apparently works only six days a week...Speaking of Pro Tems, Judge Moor's stint with Div. 1 has been extended through October:Judge Carl H. [read post]
Counterpoint: The Economist's attack on the patent system-- it's all about controlling the narrative
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 pm
Views have been expressed pro and con, as one might expect concerning an issue as complicated as this: how do we define and measure innovation, on the one hand, and how does one tease out the effect of the patent system, on the other? [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 10:13 am
Quid pro quo, if you will. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 10:05 pm
Readdle makes some great apps, including Scanner Pro, PDF Expert 5, Calendars 5 and Spark. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:57 am
The LGBT harassment lawyers at Phillips & Associates represent New York City employees, former employees, and job seekers in claims for sexual harassment and other violations of city, state, or federal employment statutes. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
Anxiety has been expressed in pro-BBC quarters about the members of the Charter Review advisory group [pdf] set up by the DCMS. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:07 am
Phillips & Associates’ sexual harassment attorneys advocate for the rights of New York City employees, former employees, and job applicants in claims for unlawful employment practices like sexual harassment and hostile work environment. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
BuzzFeed News reported that after accepting the gifts, Drayton said Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon needed to learn more about marijuana. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 1:00 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.): On Friday, June 19, 2015, the D.C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
Francesca never visited Phillip in Mississippi, and Phillip never told Francesca that he lived in Mississippi. [read post]
15 May 2015, 2:17 pm
-based attorney at Phillips Lytle LLP and a trained and certified expert in BBQ is a judge. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:52 am
Mark Phillips, president of the Arizona-based Lipsmark, told WRAL that “no one wants a nanny state telling its citizens what they can and cannot drink. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
This Court, pursuant to the Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b), must consider and conduct the calculations delineated there as well as the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b)(f), which permit a deviation from the calculations set forth therein. [read post]
