Search for: "Phillips v. Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court's anticipated decision in Smith v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:12 am
The case was Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm
Phillips, No. 11-0148/MC, which presents these issues: I. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
and serial MARQUES activists Adrian Smith and David Stone. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
The judgment of Rix LJ (with whom Smith and Richards LJJ agreed) contains discussion of several issues of general interest. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
MARTYN SMITH v PRESS ASSOCIATION LTD 4/2/2010 45. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
’” David Phillip Wilson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:09 am
Smith of Siebman, Reynolds, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP to supply an amicus curiae brief on the application of Star Trek, or for that matter, any sci-fi show and its application to Texas law. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
Smith of Jenner & Block in Washington, D. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The Court of Appeal (Sedley, Smith LLJ) had, in a single judgment of the Court [...] [read post]
