Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)" Results 261 - 280 of 69,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
The court denied defendant's motion to exclude testimony of plaintiff's damages expert as to royalty calculations that allegedly included all copies of the accused devices regardless of whether such devices practiced the patented method. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
The district court held that the plaintiff's expert's testimony ran afoul of the Federal Circuit's decision in Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by Andrew Frisch
 Denying the defendants motion, the court explained that OJ’s do not shift attorney’s fees in FLSA cases, because: (1) OJ’s only shift fees where a plaintiff prevails at trial, but for less than the amount of the OJ; and (2) the FLSA does not permit fee shifting to a defendant. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:04 am
Plaintiff's renewed motion for a preliminary injunction precluding defendant "from launching in the United States its generic raloxifene product" was granted where defendant conceded infringement but contested validity and enforceability. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
This unpublished opinion illustrates yet again the consequences of failing to comply with California's unique rule that a plaintiff cannot obtain punitive damages unless the plaintiff presents meaningful evidence of the defendant's ability to pay.The plaintiff here won a $20,000 punitive damages award at trial. [read post]
The defendants removed the case under CAFA, and the plaintiffs moved to remand under CAFA’s local controversy exception. [read post]
24 May 2021, 11:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Every defendant's lawyer seeking to dismiss the case under Rule 12 must find a way around Littlejohn. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Yesterday, counsel for defendants/appellants filed a petition for rehearing before the Federal Circuit in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am by Kevin
Various Defendants; it's just Various v. [read post]