Search for: "Plante v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 2,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 11:05 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking to represent a class of all persons in the United States who have purchased Wesson Oils from 2007 on. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am by Hannah Catt
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 7:32 am by Will Baude
In 2008, the Tenth Circuit decided a case called United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:51 am by Paul Weiland
In a recent decision (pdf), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho remanded a determination (pdf) by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:38 am
It's polluting not only the atmosphere but the West Coast of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:44 am by Dan Farber
  The “major question” regarding the social cost of carbon is supposedly whether to include damage from climate change outside the borders of the United States in the estimate. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Williams, United States Magistrate Judge) BACKGROUND: The original decision in question here was discussed in a prior ESA blawg (June 2008). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:34 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]