Search for: "Polk v. Polk" Results 261 - 280 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2008, 4:15 am
"In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs cannot show that defendant Ferrante's failure to comply with a condition precedent under plaintiffs' contract was the cause of any loss (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]), since Ferrante did not prevent them from obtaining the same recovery at a later juncture. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:47 am
The court begins by explaining that Shane North was “convicted in the Circuit Court, Polk County . . . of dealing in stolen property and he appealed. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:10 am
After arguing with the man in a store, Jarvis talked to his pastor and then went to the Polk County Sheriff's Office. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A legal malpractice claim requires that the plaintiff show that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession which results in actual damages to a plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence” (AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 [2007]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169 [1987]). [read post]