Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 261 - 280 of 2,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 February 2022, the Court of Appeal refused all fifteen grounds of appeal in Cheng v Pan; Cheng v Zhou [2022] NSWCA 21. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:24 am by Elim
., Special Eyre Rolls of Hugh Bigod 1258-1260 V. 1 & 2 (London: Selden Society, 2021). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
On 8 and 9 February 2022, there was a hearing in Vardy v Rooney before Mrs Justice Steyn. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down in Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) on the 1 February 2022. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfEarlier today the Supreme Court granted review in two cases that pose the same question: "Should this Court overrule Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Jan. 6 Committee Subpoenas Giuliani, Sidney Powell MSN – Jacqueline Alemany and Tom Hamburger (Washington Post) | Published: 1/18/2022 The House committee investigating the insurrection of January 6, 2021, issued subpoenas to members of former President Trump’s outside legal team who pursued and disseminated unfounded claims of mass election fraud, including Trump’s former personal attorney Rudolph Giuliani, former White House aide Boris Epshteyn, and lawyers… [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Goldsmith v Bissett-Powell, heard on 13 January 2022 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.A CEO’s shares in a company acquired by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) were not subject to a lockup restriction, the Delaware Court of Chancery held. [read post]