Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth"
Results 261 - 280
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 1:46 am
Thus, if a judge agrees to continue a case without any findings, a defendant could be required to complete conditions by the Commonwealth and have the Commonwealth move for a dismissal upon completion.Taylor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:59 pm
On that date, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court decided the case of Harkness v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:56 am
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am
Deweese-Boyd v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:22 pm
SCOTUSBlog petitions to watch 11-24-09 conference A potential exclusionary rule case, dressed in RS's clothing: Docket: 09-102 Title: Virginia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:15 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Therefore, the power has to be construed narrowly and strictly. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
This brings us to a recent decision from the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Valenta v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:54 am
On February 20, 1905, the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 11:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
S. 703 (1888); Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
VI, § 6 (adopting the common law generally); Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
In doing so, the Court has, it seems, concluded that the act of state doctrine cannot, consistently with the Australian Constitution, preclude an action against the Commonwealth based upon an allegation that the Commonwealth has exceeded its executive or legislative power. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Zogenix, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:55 pm
The Federal Court found that section 657A(2)(b) which seeks to confer on the Takeovers Panel the judicial power of the Commonwealth, was in contravention of Chapter 3 of the Constitution of Australia. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court's professed faith in the power of limiting instructions, see, e.g., Samia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
For instance, take the matter of Upper Darby Township v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
This absurd decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:42 pm
(v) the theft of state property . . ." [read post]
