Search for: "Powers v. Schwartz"
Results 261 - 280
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 6:48 am
Williams v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:59 am
"Greenman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm
Not surprising, given that the Supreme Court has not been able to settle on hard core doctrine, and even now -- some 80+ years since the modern recognition of the doctrine in Pennsylvania Coal v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
Baber and Robert V. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
Schwartz, Information Privacy Law (3rd ed. 2009) — and that certainly wouldn’t be fun! [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:16 pm
Schwartz chimes in from LegalTech and Marylee Abrams responds to his post. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The agreement, filed in federal court in Kansas, resolves violations of the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements at the company’s Jeffrey Energy Center, a coal-fired power plant near St. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:16 am
Yes, coming on tour to a concrete container of justice near you, and laying their heavy power trio groove down on an innocent little sj entered by Judge Wilson in Ortega v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:24 pm
" You can access the audio of today's oral argument in Mohamed v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
Appropriately enough given the venue, Daniel Schwartz at the Connecticut Employment Law Blog has one of the first substantive analyses of this morning's Supreme Court decision in Ricci v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:17 pm
Geary v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:31 pm
Okay, it appears as though things are really back to normal after power outages at the data center. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:48 pm
The case is James LoBiondo Jr v Grace Schwartz, decided May 14, 209, Case A-86/87-07. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
