Search for: "Price v. Price et al" Results 261 - 280 of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm by Seth Hilton
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:10 am
Avanir Pharmaceuticals et al., 2007 WL 772889 (Cal. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:08 pm
  The Justice issued no opinion in simply denying a stay application (08A714) in Stolt-Nielsen SA, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
  The buyers claimed that the underwriters unlawfully agreed with each other not to sell shares of a popular new issue to a buyer unless that buyer committed to: (1) buy additional shares of that security later at escalating prices, a practice called "laddering"; (2) pay unusually high commissions on subsequent security purchases from the underwriters; or (3) purchase from the underwriters other less desirable securities, a practice called "tying. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:29 am by Steven Cohen
Nuvasive, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – February 1st, 2018) involves a claim of securities fraud. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Gregory B. Williams
Bloomberg L.P. et al., Civil Action No. 14-561-GMS (D.Del., January 19, 2017), the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am by John McFarland
Sheppard, et al., No. 13-19-00036-CV making a deep dive into when post-production costs can be deducted from the plaintiffs’ royalty. [read post]
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al., 2012 WL 251909 (E.D.N.Y. 2012). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
Sitar, et al., appellants, v Steven Sitar, et al., defendants, Kevin J. [read post]