Search for: "Price v. R & A Sales" Results 261 - 280 of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2013, 6:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  Section 2-305(1)(a) of the UCC provides:  The parties if they so intend can conclude a contract for sale even though the price is not settled. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:21 am by Renae Lloyd
 This appears to be at a significant loss for investors since the original offering price was $25.00/share. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm by Mike
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
See complaint.The complaint identifies four groups of defendants: David R. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:30 pm
The contravening conduct of Prouds flows from the fact that goods offered for sale in the context of dual pricing, were not offered for sale at the "was" price in the period immediately before the sale. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:29 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a significant judgment, the High Court of Australia has changed an aspect of patent law in Australia, ruling by a 4-3 majority that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product: Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Case Name: Williams Production RMT Co. v. [read post]