Search for: "Price v. Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 9:22 am
She is a law clerk at Price Benowitz LLP and in her final year of law school. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 2:49 pm
Over on Aistemos, the Law on the Market gets a look-over and the question is asked: do share prices respond sensibly to IP-relevant court decisions. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:20 am
Smith U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 8:21 pm
Sheila Mahony Smith, et al., C.A. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Smith, 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
Cyril Smith [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
U.S. (09-1302) — validity of “state secrets” doctrine in a defense contract lawsuit (Question 1 in 09-1298 and Question 2 in 09-1302; cases consolidated for one hour of argument) Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
In Virginia v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:13 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access:
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTReal PropertySale's Specific Performance Upheld; Case Remanded For Price Adjustment Given Incomplete Renovation Flowers, plaintiffs-appellants-respondents v. 73rd Townhouse LLC, defendant-respondent-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYAlternative Dispute ResolutionArbitrator's Reliance of Credibility Solely on Record Denies Teacher Fair Hearing; Decision… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
(6) Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:47 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
This case concerns bankruptcy, jurisdiction, and chapter 11.Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
