Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois"
Results 261 - 280
of 835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:11 pm
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 90 S. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Holderman in Chicago (Northern District of Illinois) has largely adopted Judge Robart's approach, and in at least one respect -- the royalty base -- he actually took a licensee-friendlier approach, focusing completely on the price of WiFi chipsets because the patent holder failed to convince him of a royalty based on the price of an entire end product.The numerical outcome is that Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, a patent assertion entity that "has sued numerous coffee shops,… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:34 am
Contractors v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:37 pm
Nine years later, in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
Refusing to cede control of LinkedIn group supports noncompete, trade secret claims against employee
1 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Illinois Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
S. 481 (1968), and Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
S. 481 (1968), and Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 1:16 pm
Case citation: Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
In Chicago, for example, car rental customers pay a 5 percent Illinois state car rental tax, a 6 percent excise tax levied by the city’s Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (MPEA), and another 9 percent personal property lease transaction tax levied by the city of Chicago.[4] State car rental excise taxes are applied either on an ad valorem basis, where the tax applies to a percentage of the sale price, or as a flat dollar amount. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:04 am
Read the whole opinion, VC&M, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:37 pm
In LG Display, the Illinois Attorney General sued 8 manufacturers of LCD products, alleging that their pricing was unlawfully inflated in violation of the Illinois Antitrust Act ("IAA"). [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court rejected Sprint’s reliance on Preston v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 2:45 am
Barbara's Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Watson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Watson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
As a result, other states contend, car prices all over the country are higher than they would be if California were not allowed to implement a standard more stringent than the federal baseline. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
” Burdick is in Illinois. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:45 am
"--Court: Court of Appeals of KansasOpinion Date: 4/17/09Cite: Progressive Products, Inc. v. [read post]
