Search for: "Price v. The State of Texas" Results 261 - 280 of 1,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
  The Supreme Court decision, Illinois Brick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:24 pm
The Act provided that a class action could not be maintained unless the purported violation was either (1) an act or practice declared to be deceptive or unconscionable by a rule adopted by the Attorney General before the consumer transaction on which the action was based or (2) an act or practice determined by an Ohio state court to violate the Act and committed after the decision had been made public.The purchaser could not pursue a claim under the Ohio Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:41 am by Charles Sartain
Stating a fact or making a promise and things change, you could be a fraudster if you don’t come clean before closing.That’s the takeaway in Baxsto, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:21 pm by Leiza Dolghih
 Last week, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in LasikPlus of Texas, P.C., et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
Texas Medical Board, a Fifth Circuit case involving the antitrust state-action immunity doctrine. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
") In 1909, the Texas Supreme Court followed Watson in the case of Brown v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by B.W. Barnett
Yesterday the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released it opinion in Tolbert v. [read post]