Search for: "Price v. United States Government et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Though no one in the corporate-owned media can be bothered to bring it up, unelected and unaccountable supranational bodies will set policies that govern how food is allowed to be grown in the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, et al., 2009 WL 73274 (N.D.Ill. 03/16/09). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A., et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
It could further involve overcharging, mis-coding, pricing schemes, off-label marketing, kickbacks and failure to return overpayments. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
At about 11 a.m. on Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Shanahan et al., 2010 WL 148440 (E.D.Mo. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
Tyrrell et al., C.A. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It receives no government or taxpayer contributions. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 One example shows the case of Fagan v Amerisourcebergen Corp. et al. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
By using futures, oil companies reduce their exposure to price volatility in a specific transaction and plan future purchases and sales of its inventory. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
[iii] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China. [read post]
