Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 261 - 280
of 837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Department of Revenue for the State of Washington 16-308 Issue: Whether, or under what circumstances, imposing additional tax beyond the year preceding the legislative session in which the law was enacted violates due process. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
KATHY DEASY, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:12 pm
Thus, the new rule states, “Net operating revenues generated by the IFF are also applied to fund initiatives benefitting other authorized FAS [Federal Acquisition Services] programs, in accordance with 40 U.S.C. 321. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
North Carolina Department of Revenue 22-890Issues: (1) Whether the North Carolina Supreme Court was correct that state courts and taxing authorities no longer must follow McLeod v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
In Quinlan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:48 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Tax Court for publication opinions today (1): Indiana Dept. of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
They include "four distinct options" for addressing prior offshore non-compliance. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am
Malkin v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:40 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 22-323Issue: Whether the Treasury Department’s failure to respond to comments raising concerns about 26 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:04 am
Also illustrative is the trial court’s ruling in Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:59 am
Sciscoe et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
Montana Department of Revenue, 18-1195 Issue: Whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:49 pm
Chen, Appellate Division, Second Department, September 13, 2011, 2011 NY Slip Op 06466)Also, in Jason Robert’s, Inc. v. [read post]
