Search for: "Pro-Mark Services Inc"
Results 261 - 280
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 9:59 am
Meggitt (Orange County), Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm
Eight days after the Applicant’s filing, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, (“Opposer”) filed two applications with the USPTO for NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE (a word mark and a stylized mark) both for mortgage lending services. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
The Rogers approach was adopted by Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We discern no principled basis upon which to justify awarding that additional amount.765 A.2d at 790 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
Amedisys, Inc., No. 13-30580 (5th Cir. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
" It declared the application void ab initio because pro se Applicant Bonnie Tseng failed to prove use of the mark for the recited services prior to the filing of her use-based application to register. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:10 pm
Co. v Google, Inc., 330 F.Supp.2d 700, 704-705 (E.D. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
Leflar; Law Clerk, McMath Woods, P.A.; Public Interest Extern, Attorney General for the Cherokee Nation; Corporate Extern, Walmart Stores, Inc.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 12:39 pm
This post was written by Mark S. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:05 am
On August 14th, Pro-Football, Inc. filed a complaint in the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:24 am
"The founder and owner of a company called "myUndies.com, Inc," which existed from 1999 to 2001, had used the mark MYUNDIES in connection with online retail services, but Respondent was not involved inhis company. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Might their marks be challenged next? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The “tacking” doctrine allows an individual to claim an earlier date of use to a mark based on their earlier use of similar mark for similar services. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
Pro Football, Inc., resulted from a proceeding to cancel six trademark registrations used by the Washington Redskins football team. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Pro-Football, Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:46 am
Pro-Football, Inc., Cancellation No. 92046185 (June 18, 2014) [precedential].Amanda BlackhorseThis is the second time the TTAB has considered a petition for cancellation of these registrations. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/nj10kEzW2Y -> BREAKING: IP Minister confirms that private copying and parody exceptions are still on track for adoption (but later… http://t.co/E24UwgP0aR -> Google Blocks Demonoid for Spreading Malicious Software http://t.co/58lP3wTdyA -> The Case for Authors’ Rights: A View From Within http://t.co/sgvBpHx1XD -> A Fair Deal for Authors http://t.co/TUnaARTvy9 -> Marking IP exams: mother entitled to be author of child's painting because she… [read post]
10 May 2014, 8:25 am
This is such an easy case, it could have only been brought pro se. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:06 am
& Financial Services, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2014 WL 806385 (9th Cir. [read post]
