Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 261 - 280 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2011, 10:17 am by WSLL
Issues: Whether the Department of Family Services was required to provide a compelling reason for recommending a permanency plan of termination over relative guardianship under Wyo. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
The father also agreed to open a preventative services file with the local social services agency and bring the child to mental health counseling. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The High Court in the impugned judgment has declined to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant and aggrieved by the said order, the appellant has approached this Court by filing this appeal. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Third Department Affirms Initial Custody Award Made without Evidentary Hearing In Matter of Cole v Cole, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975299, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Fourth Department States That Federal Poverty Income Guidelines Do Not Apply Where Income Is Imputed in Excess of Guidelines Amount In Niagra County Department of Social Services ex rel Hueber v Hueber, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433691 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Support Magistrate imputed income to Respondent based on the minimum wage for a period of over three years and ordered that he pay child support arrears for that period of $1,870.68. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Fourth Department States That Federal Poverty Income Guidelines Do Not Apply Where Income Is Imputed in Excess of Guidelines Amount In Niagra County Department of Social Services ex rel Hueber v Hueber, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433691 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Support Magistrate imputed income to Respondent based on the minimum wage for a period of over three years and ordered that he pay child support arrears for that period of $1,870.68. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm by Joel R. Brandes
V Shyou H., --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975542 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.), the Appellate Division affirmed an order which directed respondent to pay $950 a month for the support of the parties' child. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Sebelius Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-2281 September 19, 2011 Judge: Seymour Areas of Law: Contracts, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law This was the second appeal in litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
Finney and Alexis Alyea – Counsel for the Appellants, Cascades Inc. and Cascades Fine Papers Group Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
SebeliusCourt: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-1058, 11-1057 September 8, 2011 Judge: Motz Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Health Law The Commonwealth of Virginia brought suit against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, challenging one provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the non-custodial parent's income is less than or equal to the poverty income guidelines amount for a single person as reported by the federal department of health and human services, unpaid child support arrears in excess of five hundred dollars shall not accrue. [read post]