Search for: "Query v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Some have queried the description of Ben Field as a “deputy warden”, a post that Ben Field held at the church in September 2014. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:47 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
United States, which held that accessing historical records containing the cellphones' physical locations requires a search warrant, even though they were held by a third-party. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:30 am by Ted Tjaden
Of the citing cases, CanLII had United Gulf Developments Limited v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
It seems that he was wrong on that account too, at least according to the majority of the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
Google itself has an interesting discussion of its new Google Scholar legal opinions and journals search engine, now in Beta, on its blog:As many of us recall from our civics lessons in school, the United States is a common law country. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Amy Howe
If that were true, she queried, why exactly would the state have to forge ahead without one? [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the… [read post]