Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder" Results 261 - 280 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Even the USPTO now regrets having originally issued Apple's D'677 patent, which covers little more than a round button. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm by Guest Barista
And in case of R&D companies that are holder of the intellectual property, they either have subsidiary manufacturing units or outsource it to companies that do possess the requisite infrastructure to carry out large-scale production. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Accused infringer need not test prior art patented products to prove invalidity: Viskase Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
Holmes, individually and d/b/a Homer's Restaurant, both of Peru, Indiana, unlawfully intercepted and televised the Ultimate Fighting Championship 141:Brock Lesnar v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
  Permit holders were responsible for purchasing the devices. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by James Hamilton
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]