Search for: "RE v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 40,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
” In re Vial, 115 F.3d 1192, 1194 (4th Cir.1997). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
Here are three of them:United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
R (Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:24 am
The United States Bankruptcy Court in Denver, Colorado, through the Honorable Michael Romero, provided an order regarding plaintiffs’ problems with a home they purchased from an entity controlled or represented by defendants. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm
II) State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
The very first case which squarely addressed the issue of whether or not the RIAA's "making available" theory stated a claim for relief under the Copyright Act was a Connecticut case, Atlantic v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:08 am
Here is the pleading in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
She stated, at paras. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Obama (relisted after 3/18 Conference) Docket: 10-775 Issue(s): Whether petitioners have a habeas corpus right to be brought into the United States and released, outside the framework of the federal immigration laws and in contravention of specific statutory restrictions on their transfer to the United States, when they have been granted habeas corpus relief and received appropriate offers of resettlement from two different countries but have declined to accept… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:51 am
Cir. 1998), and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 6:57 am
Come up and say hello afterward if you’re there. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
The briefs in the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 2:35 pm
The post Justice Sotomayor Needs To Re-Read <i>Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
Question presented: Is the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi’s conviction in that court barred his subsequent prosecution in a United States District Court for a crime arising out of the same incident? [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
