Search for: "REED v LITTLE" Results 261 - 280 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
Evidence was also given of little contact with customers after June 2010, due to the knowledge of OA’s liquidation. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
”  OK, prescriber testimony is that idyllic, but allow us a little poetic leeway. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
The leading judgment in the Supreme Court was given by the President, Lord Neuberger (with whom Lords Kerr and Reed agreed). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
  Very little slips through the small space between the two. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O’Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News Blurred Lines v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
The Supreme Court had little difficulty rejecting this argument. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
The other Operation Elveden trial – R v Wells and others – has received very little publicity over the last two weeks. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Arsenal v Reed is an example, and contains the first statement that the double identity provisions are to be interpreted as requiring in addition a prejudice to the trade mark functions. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
  When that happens, you have to stick to it and be the little remover that could.In Jackson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:18 pm
The venue: the London office of Reed Smith; the subject: whether the protection of copyright extends to cover smells and perfumes. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s oral argument in Reed v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:09 am by Lyle Denniston
”  That one comment seemed to sum up the quite poor prospects for the sign-regulating ordinance at issue in Reed v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am by Amy Howe
” In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s oral argument in Reed v. [read post]