Search for: "RESEARCH CORP V MICROSOFT CORP"
Results 261 - 280
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2008, 7:36 am
"The List":1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP - 31482 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR - 27253 CANON K K JP - 19874 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO LTD JP - 19415 INTEL CORP - 18656 MICROSOFT CORP - 16377 TOSHIBA CORP JP - 15498 SONY CORP JP - 14819 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC - 147610 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT CO L P - 147011 HITACHI LTD JP - 139712 FUJITSU LTD JP - 131513 SEIKO EPSON CORP JP - 120814 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO -… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Starent Networks Corp et al filed 05/08/07 1:07-cv-02683 Degregorio v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Bard Inc.'s patent on a type of prosthetic blood vessel graft, company to pay damages of $185 million: (IPLaw360), Depomed secures summary judgment against Ivax in its patent dispute regarding its AcuForm controlled-release drug delivery technology: (IPLaw360),Dell and Motion Computing hit with patent infringement suit by Typhoon Touch: (IPBiz), EBay vows fight over final judgment in patent suit against MercExchange: (IPLaw360), … [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
V. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:58 am
Computer Acceleration Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]GlobalIBM's IP portfolio value extraction patent (IAM), (PLI), Facebook - Microsoft has beaten Google to a chunk of the popular social-networking site, agreeing to pay $240m for a 1.6 percent stake (ZDNet), Global IP Strategy - can you keep up? [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:27 am
While Lucent argues that "the record was replete with evidence that the HQ encoder will be invoked as a result of common conditions that occur routinely in practice," as the Federal Circuit noted in E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3Com Corp., 473 F.3d 1213, 1223 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:40 pm
In the UK Ofcom's research into children's TV has indicated a huge increase in programming hours, but a decline in investment. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:34 am
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
• Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
In Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 12:34 am
The leading case in Visto's enforcement effort, Visto Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:28 am
Of course, the globeandmail treated a different licensor, NTP, quite differently in reporting the NTP v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:57 am
While Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems Inc., Intel Corp. and other tech companies have filed amicus briefs calling for a change to the system, Johnson & Johnson, GE and DuPont, have filed their own briefs arguing that major changes to the patent system would jeopardize billions of dollars invested in product innovation. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 12:08 pm
Supreme court granted Microsoft's petition for a writ of certiorari in Microsoft Corp. v AT & T Corp., No. 05-1056, proceedings below, AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
