Search for: "RICHARDSON v. US "
Results 261 - 280
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
While this provision permits the submission of additional evidence, it cannot be used to add new claims against a respondent for which notice has not been provided (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
While this provision permits the submission of additional evidence, it cannot be used to add new claims against a respondent for which notice has not been provided (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
While this provision permits the submission of additional evidence, it cannot be used to add new claims against a respondent for which notice has not been provided (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
While this provision permits the submission of additional evidence, it cannot be used to add new claims against a respondent for which notice has not been provided (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:39 pm
Home Group Ltd v Henry. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:52 am
Pandongate House Management Co Ltd v Barton, High Ct (Newcastle District Registry), January 2019 (with thanks to Alice Richardson for a copy of the judgment) Lessee-owned companies are now pretty common. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Fellow panellist John Pegram (Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York) suggested that two housekeeping amendments to the AIA would be useful: (1) reversing the SAS decision to permit IPRs in respect of only some of the claims and (2) to change the post grant review (“PGR”) estoppel procedure. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Coggio (Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York), presenting on the Patent Dance: “I Won’t Dance / Don’t Ask Me”. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In contrast in Takeda v Kowa KK (I.P. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
The Daily Telegraph has an interview with the defendant who argues that the courts are being used to silence and control women. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Au moment de ces événements, la propriétaire du chien, Frineau, avait confié celui-ci à Richardson. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:49 am
One of the cases, Luis Garcia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
” This Strickland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
See, e.g., Weidner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm
Richardson, 2008 BCSC 1349, aff’d 2010 BCCA 116; Duifhuis v. [read post]
