Search for: "RUSSELL S JOHNSON"
Results 261 - 280
of 508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm
Russell Phillips and Douglas W. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
Johnson Eric_E_Johnson North Dakota Jackie Jones jackiejones27 UWE Bristol Jeffrey Kahn KahnTax Florida State Anil Kalhan kalhan Drexel Daniel Martin Katz computational Michigan State Ariel Katz relkatz Toronto Jeff Kirchmeier JLKirchmeier CUNY Renee Knake reneeknake Michigan State Mike Koehler fcpaprofessor Southern Illinois Lynne Kohm LynneMarieKohm Regent Eugene Kontorovich EVKontorovich Northwestern Russell Korobkin russellkorobkin UCLA Kim Krawiec KimKrawiec Duke Susan Landrum… [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
Kansas Dep't of Revenue, No. 106,748 (Russell) Direct appeal (petition for review); DUI administrative Michael S. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:58 am
” See also, e.g., Russell Shaw, Cyberspace Conduct: What’s Your Policy? [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:11 pm
Johnson announced the sentences. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
At the Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman analyzes last week’s per curiam decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:54 am
At In Progress, Colin Starger analyzes the Court’s recent per curiam opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman excerpts some of the highlights from yesterday’s per curiam decision in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
The second argument is in Johnson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
It was involved in a scheme under which Johnson & Johnson paid kickbacks in exchange for Omnicare pharmacists persuading doctors to prescribe Risperdal and other J&J drugs to nursing home patients. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
Bradlee’s boss. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
