Search for: "Range v. Range"
Results 261 - 280
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2006, 5:04 am
V. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
In the sharply worded 5-4 decision of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 8:49 pm
Last Friday, in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:50 am
The case involves a gun range that the United States government operates on the shores of Lake Michigan. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
(Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd (FRAND Judgment - Public Version) [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat).) [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
(Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd (FRAND Judgment - Public Version) [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat).) [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:27 am
Such was the case in Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/williams-v-san-francisco-complaintLink to video statement of attorneys and client:https://youtu.be/8gYd9oZzdHgCase pages: EFF case page ACLU case pageFor more on police spying tech: eff.org/issues/street-level-surveillance aclunc.org/issue/technology-civil-liberties Contact: SairaHussainStaff Attorneysaira@eff.org press@aclunc.org [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
See Ezell v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:51 pm
Yusuf and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
Here are a few points of commentary on the vacatur question, about which there was a range of views on the Court, to put it mildly. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:25 am
Sentencing Procedural errors Where the district court announced that it would impose the mandatory minimum sentence during the change of plea hearing, before it knew the advisory guidelines range or had heard either party's argument regarding the sentence, the sentence must be vacated. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:50 am
§ 343.307(1)(d), we conclude that the phrase 'with an excess or specified range of alcohol concentration' modifies the phrase 'using a [...] [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Support for this holding can also be found in Thompson v. 10,000 RV Sales, Inc., 130 Cal.App.4th 950, 980 (2005), in which the Court of Appeal affirmed a broad-ranging CLRA injunction that had been entered without formal class certification, and Cruz v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Travis v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:17 am
The justices are as divided as they have ever been on issues ranging from race and religion to reproductive health, guns, and campaign finance reform. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:03 am
SENTENCING United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
In Rose v. [read post]