Search for: "Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc." Results 261 - 266 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
 Second, although we’re defense lawyers, we’re not representing Medtronic on this or on any product liability matter at the moment. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]