Search for: "Roberts v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Robert Willens who is a tax professor at the Columbia Business School stated that many people will have a lot of their taxes withheld and then plan ahead for their large refund with plans to use it for things like purchasing a car or going on vacation. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984), fn. 6; United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:58 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court will hear oral arguments next month to determine whether a Superior Court judgment allowing press access to certain criminal record information should be overturned. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Filed: February 27, 2019Opinion by: Judge Robert N. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Zobel, who served on the Massachusetts Superior Court and who had assembled a remarkable collection of Holmes materials over decades of research into the justice’s judicial career — I was able to be the first biographer of Holmes to make a thorough examination of Holmes’ experiences as a trial judge. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:17 am
See Marek v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am
A recent post-trial decision out of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, Personal Touch Holding Corp. v Glaubach, brings home this lesson with similar colloquial color. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
General Impressions: USPAP, Nichols, and the Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s decisions are the starting point for any constitutional issue. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Justice Robert H. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:24 am
The California Supreme Court ruled in the 2008 case of Ross v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Robert P. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:36 am
As Chief Justice John Roberts explained in King v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
” Dissent in Murdock v Pennsylvania Justice Reed authored a dissent, in which Justices Frankfurter, Jackson, and Roberts joined. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
” He suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in the recent case of Ortiz v. [read post]
