Search for: "Rodgers v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
UK (1990) 67 DR 244, Matky v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:58 pm
He also gave the United States 30 days to file a surreply. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:35 pm
The gender discrimination claim was also dismissed.The case is Schechner v CBS Broad Inc., NDCal, July 14, 2010. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The succinct test stated by Lord Rodger at [7] will be a useful starting point for first instance judges in cases where anonymity applications are made. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm
Secretary of State for Home Department (Respondent) v AP (Appellant) (no 2) [2009] EWCA Civ 731 Supreme Court 23 June 2010 AP, who had been subject to a control order and who now continued to live at the same address under bail pending a deportation decision on grounds of national security, was entitled to continuing anonymity because of the risks he faced if his identity were revealed - read judgment We posted recently on a ruling by the Supreme Court that the social isolation… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
An example raised by Lord Rodger in Savage was the obligations of state officials towards those with suicidal intent from travelling to Switzerland: of course they cannnot forcibly prevented them from doing this. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
In White v Sweden ((2008) 46 EHRR 3) the Article 8 “right to protection of reputation” was combined with the positive obligations of the state in the application. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Lord Rodger and Sir John Dyson SCJ delivered concurring judgments. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
The following essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens is by Rodger D. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
Lord Rodger thought otherwise: ‘Doubtless, some may indeed draw the unjustified inference that M fears. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
