Search for: "Rose v. State of California"
Results 261 - 280
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
Deputy Sonja V. [read post]
29 May 2022, 5:04 am
The Supreme Court has a pending Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:32 am
From the California Department of Industrial Relations Labor Commissioner in Creative Artists Agency v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
By contrast, it declined by 3.9 percent in Connecticut over the same period.[7] The issue, then, is not that tax collections rose, either in nominal or real terms, over the period; they rose almost everywhere. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:16 pm
Viens (Queen Mary, University of London) The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Altruistic Behaviours and Their FailuresDonald Pfaff (Rockefeller University, New York) Brain Images As Legal EvidenceAdina Roskies and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Dartmouth College) 13.15 LUNCH 14:15 SESSION III: The Illusion of Intentionality and Its Implications for Criminal LawColin Blakemore (Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford University)… [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:23 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:38 am
After a two-week trial, a jury in the Eastern District of California returned a defense verdict in Hill v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener:… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:40 pm
Cutera’s stock price rose almost 20% on the strength of those projections. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Times, (Feb. 18, 2021, 4:50 PM), https://www.latimes.com/entertainment–arts/story/2021–02–18/immigration–alien–noncitizen–language–politi cs-undocumented(last visited Oct. 23, 2021). 4 Beam, Adam, California to replace the word 'alien' from its laws, Associated Press News, (Sep. 24, 2021), https://apnews.com/article/immigration–california-race-and-ethnicity-racial-injustice-gavin-newsom(last visited Oct. 23, 2021).… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
For example, his notes for the October 22, 1968, conversation have the following coded names: Z = Ron Ziegler, the press spokesperson for the campaign; Harlow = Bryce Harlow, a well-connected Washington lobbyist, who had served in the Eisenhower White House doing congressional relations; Fl = Peter Flannigan, a New York based investment banker; RW = Rose Mary Woods, Candidate Nixon’s long-time personal secretary (Haldeman also refers to her in his notes as Rose); F = Bob… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 6:54 am
Acuff-Rose Music. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Times reports on the next steps in California after the Court denied cert. in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 11 February 2020 the Court of Appeal (Etherton MR, Lewison and Rose LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Fearn v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
¹ A month and half later a similar lawsuit against Dunkin’ Donuts, also filed in California, was dismissed in part for failure to state a claim with respect to whether the lactose intolerant plaintiffs had a disability as defined in the ADA. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
¹ A month and half later a similar lawsuit against Dunkin’ Donuts, also filed in California, was dismissed in part for failure to state a claim with respect to whether the lactose intolerant plaintiffs had a disability as defined in the ADA. [read post]
