Search for: "Russell et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
IMS Health, et al. (10-779). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
It would not surprise me if universities start to drop ‘unprofitable courses’ (Here is one example) – and, therein, lies poverty of the spirit of our future culture, arts, history, philososophy et al? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
[et al.].New York : Russell Sage Foundation, c2010. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
The State of Arizona, et al. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
Lenge et al. in opposition § Brief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in opposition § Petitioners’ reply Title: Stovall v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Lenge et al. in oppositionBrief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Council Tree Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
(Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.) [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
§ Amicus brief of International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention et al. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:47 am
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, is most exercised by this and has already pointed out that this could actually cost our country more because it will slow the whole process down and put even more pressure on judges who will, in effect, have to help litigants in person – who often haven’t a clue what they are doing, despite watching Silk, Rumpole et al. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent the petitioner.Title: Allshouse v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
petition of the day is: Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case.Title: Florence v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
LeMadre Development, LLC et al. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
LeMadre Development, LLC et al. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
§§ 4301 et seq. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
SimpsonDocket: 10-458Issue(s): (1) Whether a prison inmate is in "custody" for Miranda purposes if law enforcement officers isolate and question him about criminal conduct occurring outside the prison but impose no additional restraints or coercive pressures beyond those inherent in ordinary prison confinement; and (2) whether a police officer violates clearly established Miranda law by advising a defendant who asks him whether a polygraph examination will confirm the veracity of the… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Pacific Creditors Association in support of the petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Maria Pintos in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
Whiting, et al. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Candelaria, et al.) [read post]
