Search for: "S S v. State of Indiana" Results 261 - 280 of 5,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2007, 11:47 am
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in Magdalena Lopez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:25 am
Tinder in Indianapolis, who'd struck down part of the state's 2006 law banning out-of-state shipments to Indiana customers without that initial in-person contact. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The case has since been transferred to the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. d/b/a Maxi-Cosi of Columbus, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 6,467,840 (“the ‘840 Patent”) for a “Child’s Car Seat Insert”. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:56 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Indiana: Whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause is incorporated against the states under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:45 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Indiana Rule of Evidence 412(a)(3), an exception to Iowa's rape shield rule, states that evidence of an alleged victim's sexual history can be admitted if it is "evidence that the victim's pregnancy at the time of trial was not caused... [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:51 pm
Since the Indiana Supreme Court's decision in Erie, bad faith has been recognized in Indiana as an independent cause of action. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It was in the Indiana case that arrived this week as a challenge to the Seventh Circuit — Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by DSVlaw Blog
Relying on the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by xsimpledemo
Relying on the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Heartland Consumer Products LLC of Carmel, Indiana filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, as well as related wrongdoing under the Indiana State Trademark Act, the common law of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Crime Victims Act. [read post]