Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 261 - 280 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 10:50 am by Howard Friedman
Apparently, he’s an R.C. 3319.16 referee from Shelby.Justice O'Donnell also filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Pfeiffer and Kennedy. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Well, actually, it doesn’t end there. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
The inference is because an offender receives a quantity of drugs, that offender is inferred to have violated the elements of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2). [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:16 am by MBettman
Certified Question “Whether a health care provider’s statements of fault or statements admitting liability made during the course of apologizing or commiserating with a patient or the patient’s family are prohibited from admission of evidence in a civil action under Ohio’s apology statute, R.C. 2317.43. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
" And since the verdict form didn't say that clearly, and since it didn't state the degree of offense, well, then the aggravating element doesn't count.More, the court of appeals noted that even though Wells didn't object at trial, that's OK, because Pelfrey didn't object either and, more to the point, the court had previously decided that"[i]t is the [S]tate's… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:25 am
Of course, a week in the 8th wouldn’t be complete without at least one head-scratcher, and that’s provided by State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  Of course, you don’t need one for self-defense; if you reasonably believe there’s a gun, that’s just as good. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am by MBettman
 Pursuant to R.C. 2307.96, a plaintiff must now prove that the conduct of a particular defendant was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Singleton, he’s entitled to a new hearing, but only “for the limited purpose of the proper imposition of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
  But Mosmeyer’s argument went nowhere, either, since he “has failed to identify any existing rule of criminal procedure that conflicts with R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am by MBettman
In November of 2015, Buttery was indicted for failing to register with the Hamilton County Sheriff’s office in violation of R.C. 2950.04. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  What’s more, pursuant to statute, the five-year specification for shooting out of a vehicle and the three-year spec for brandishing a firearm don’t merge, either. [read post]