Search for: "SAY MEDIA GROUP LTD."
Results 261 - 280
of 703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Cowles Media (1991)), this still leaves the question: Did Banks' speech breach the agreement? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva made an interim order against the Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS), the Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL) and Novex Communications Pvt Ltd preventing them from contravening section 33 of India's Copyright Act, which provides that only registered societies can grant licences in respect of copyrighted work(s). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
And it isn’t enough to say, “but I can’t solve the problem by myself. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
In Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd, Guest Kat Rosie takes her shot into the red cups! [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2988 https://t.co/WV7oks5xAC 2017-12-01 Facebook will temporarily stop advertisers from excluding certain races https://t.co/41qI3NLsGf 2017-12-01 Judge Hacon’s 10 (+ 1) commandments on joint authorship under UK copyright law https://t.co/pYcCbFmt1f 2017-12-01 News: Morrisons found liable in landmark data protection group action https://t.co/1LNFQH6mZ1 2017-12-01 No copyright in TREB database, TREB v Commissioner of Competition… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The IP Industry Base (IPIB), a database developed by the Competitive Intelligence Group at the Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy (IMW), Leipzig, might provide some. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
We could say more, but will leave the discovery to our readers. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
Guest Kat Eibhlin answers the question by analyzing the recent decision Generics (U.K) v Yeda, a practical application of the Supreme Court’s Actavis v Eli Lilly.Internet and Digital Media Law conference returns to London! [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
As as result of this statement News Group applied to discharge the injunction. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
By its nature, the press is a smaller and more controllable group of individuals. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
In cases involving business, there may be a regulatory standard that allows only a limited role to the right-thinking person test (see Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985 at [34(iii)]). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
On 7 November 2017 the first meeting of the Media and Communications List User Group took place at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
What does the law actually say? [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd & Anor v Taylor Hampton Solicitors Ltd & Anor will begin in the High Court this week. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
In the case of Plymouth Brethren (Exclusive Brethren) Christian Church v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd; Plymouth Brethren (Exclusive Brethren) Christian Church v The Age Company Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 214 McCallum J dismissed a claim for defamation on the basis that the words complained of were not capable of identifying the plaintiffs. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
FireEye had previously released a December 1, 2014 report about a group of hackers called “FIN4. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
In the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J had held that in order for a statement to be defamatory that it has to cross a ‘threshold of seriousness’ and that the appropriate test was whether a statement had a tendency to cause ‘substantial’ reputational harm. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
In the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J had held that in order for a statement to be defamatory that it has to cross a ‘threshold of seriousness’ and that the appropriate test was whether a statement had a tendency to cause ‘substantial’ reputational harm. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
In the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J had held that in order for a statement to be defamatory that it has to cross a ‘threshold of seriousness’ and that the appropriate test was whether a statement had a tendency to cause ‘substantial’ reputational harm. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause… [read post]
