Search for: "SHARP v. SHARP." Results 261 - 280 of 4,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
District in the Northern District of Illinois, in rejecting a motion for an emergency TRO filed to halt the sales of knockoff unicorn and dragon art.Judge Rebukes Unicorn Artist's Motion as 'Insensitive to Others in the Current Environment'A plaintiffs lawyer bringing an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order to halt sales of knockoff unicorn and dragon art got a sharp rebuke from U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:08 am by Mark Summerfield
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Apotex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 928 (31 August 2012) Interlocutory injunctions – prima facie case – balance of convenience – permanent impact of generic competition upon market for pharmaceutical products The Federal Court of Australia (Justice Jagot) has issued a preliminary injunction barring generic pharmaceutical manufacturer from marketing and selling nasal sprays containing the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) for the… [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
In this new piece entitled "Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide," Tony Mauro highlights a point that I noticed when reading today's 5-4 decision in Bowles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 12:07 pm
The question now is whether the additional conduct alleged in plaintiffs’ opposition -- Mann’s failure to use a turn signal, making of a sharp left turn from the middle of the snow run, failure to warn skiers on mambo of his presence, and failure to warn skiers of the existence of Old Boneyard Road -- elevated Mann’s conduct to gross negligence. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
  First, the Court of Appeal (Pill and Elias LJJ and Sharp J) handed down judgment in the case of Ashcroft v Foley ([2012] EWCA Civ 423). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 2023 NY Slip Op 05383 [220 AD3d 587], October 24, 2023the Appellate Division, First Department found that there was no collateral estoppel, but nevertheless, the case was untimely. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Sued if you do, sued if you don’t: drugmaker faces lawsuits over failure to provide Fosamax warning that FDA told it not to provide [Jim Copland, James Beck on Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]