Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
United States, 318 U.S. 236, 244 (1943). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
And what does this policy mean for asylum seekers who want to enter the United States? [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
United States and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 2:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:58 am
Sharp v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
International and United States law prohibits the discharge of waste containing more than 15 parts per million oil without treatment by an oil water separator and oil sensing equipment. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
In practical terms, it's another Nokia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:32 am
United Farm Workers National Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979); Younger v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm
” The United States, United Kingdom and Australia will negotiate the details of the deal during the next 18 months, focusing particularly on safeguards and nonproliferation measures. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
Sharpe, Judge), arguing that the district court erred by (1) concluding that the sentence recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") accounted for the factors under § 3553(a) and (2) failing to state adequately its reasons for imposing the chosen sentence, as required by § 3553(c). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
