Search for: "STATE v BARTLETT"
Results 261 - 280
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Just see Wells v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has demonstrably been on the front lines of prescription medical product liability litigation throughout this period:· Bartlett v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
The case is Lashley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
See Bartlett v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
We have also said, particularly since Bartlett, that claims based on the need to change one drug to a different drug, to the extent they could be cognizable under any state’s design defect law, should be preempted. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
SeeBell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Lance v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
Kus v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:39 am
Related blog posts: Prescription Drug Liability Case Receives 21 Million Verdict – Bartlett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm
In one case, Bartlett v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S.Ct. 2466 (2013) and Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
The case is Wilson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
Uniquely, the Trilogy let design defect claims slide after Bartlett – including a gratuitous footnote about innovator drugs. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
