Search for: "STATE v KIRKLAND"
Results 261 - 280
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
(stating that intentional ratification may be shown by party’s acceptance of benefits under agreement, after becoming fully aware of fraud); Motel Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Cases To Be Argued This Week Joan Biskupic of USA Today writes a very detailed and thorough article on United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Thus, in Sandra Kirkland v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Smith, of Kirkland & Ellis, on a subject dear to our hearts: "Preemption after Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:26 am
Watch Tribal Rights in Education Nationally and in Your State Melody McCoy | Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado Watch Tribal Tax Planning for Construction and Other Projects After Barona v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:29 am
In March, the high court struck down pre-emption involving drugs in a major case, Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Starr of Kirkland & Ellis LLP in Los Angeles will argue for the petitioners. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
The report often states facts in a way that implies the bicycle rider was at-fault or at-least partially at fault for the bicycle v. car collision. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
California was the first state to define and adopt the community property system. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
It also provides a useful description of Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
District Court, judges are free to guess what they think the California Supreme Court would decide.** When interpreting state law, federal courts are bound by decisions of the state's highest court (In re Kirkland (9th Cir.1990) 915 F.2d 1236, 1238), but in the absence of such a decision, a federal court shall apply the rule that it believes the state supreme court would adopt if faced with the same issue. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
