Search for: "STATE v STOKES"
Results 261 - 280
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm
ADT, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:35 pm
” Hooper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
Walker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:28 am
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen looks ahead to Fisher v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:47 am
Stokes argued the seminal “stop and frisk” case of Terry v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:47 am
Wickard v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
One of my favorites concerned the 1953 California appellate court case, Banks v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:35 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:08 am
Last year a Texas federal court in San Antonio held discrimination against transgender employees was not a form of discrimination prohibited under the sex stereotyping analysis (Eure v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am
The incident, Fitzgerald says, is based on a 2008 homicide case, State of Alabama v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 11:58 am
” See Sheppard v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
As a federal court ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
NSM Resources Corp. and Huck Doll LLC v. [read post]
