Search for: "STRIPE, INC."
Results 261 - 280
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:27 am
[Plaintiff's arguments] essentially admit that [the accused product] does not always write full stripes to empty logical tracks. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:14 am
This post is based on a Corporate Governance commentary by Latham & Watkins and Georgeson Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
The sets were sold in sizes XXS (2t-3t), XS (3t-4t), S (5-6), M (7-8) and L (10-12), and in three varieties: Black - Multicolored stripes/polka dots White - Multicolored stripes/polka dots Pink - Blue stripes and oversized polka dots Sold exclusively at: Various retailers nationwide from March 2008 through July 2009 for between $30 (U.S.) and in Canada from March 2008 through November 2009 for about $30 (CAN). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:25 am
I'm on pin(stripes) and needles! [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Pro-Football, Inc (The IP Factor) (TTABlog) Brazil gets closer to listing US IP retaliation targets (IP tango) Global Global - General Why the lack of ACTA transparency is not standard (Michael Geist) WIPO, a (rare) profitable UN agency, ventures into world of donors (IP Watch) WIPO Director wraps up official visit to India topped by meeting with Prime Minister (WIPO) Delegates look to April for consensus on development agenda coordination (IP Watch) International conference calls… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:34 pm
The case cite is Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:11 pm
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:14 am
However, Stephen Slesinger Inc., a company that represents his estate, accused Disney of accounting trickery to lower the royalties paid. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 11:00 pm
A white box van with blue and red stripes – you know the one. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 7:53 pm
OPINION: MADD.org Betrays Supporters and Morphs into MADD, Inc. : DUIAttorney.com: “So... [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:43 pm
(scaling back largest-ever $305 million jury verdict to a still-hefty $65 million in three-stripe vs. two- and four-stripe athletic shoe infringement case) AutoZone, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
They range from unemployed to established attorneys of all stripes, including lawyers with nontraditional careers. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Last month, Eddie Van Halen's company, ELVH, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:30 am
Van Halen created three striped designs which he used on his "Frankenstein" guitars. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
Most of the lawyers with whom I deal in my professional life are Crown Attorneys of various stripes. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI clarifies… [read post]
