Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co., LTD." Results 261 - 280 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 2:14 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on a June 1, 2011 complaint and June 17 and 20 letters supplementing the complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain liquid crystal display devices and products containing same that infringe U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Apple further states that on April 15, 2011, it filed suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and related entities in the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 8:47 am by Kirk M. Hartung
  Globally, the top 10 patent companies for 2022 are: Panasonic Holdings Corp; Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Research In Motion Ltd., Research in Motion Corporation, Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
As of the end of 2008, Spansion was the third largest provider of flash memory worldwide, behind Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Toshiba. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Jay Yurkiw
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 11-CV-1846 (N.D. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:36 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on a December 1, 2009 complaint and December 16, 2009 letter supplementing the complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display (“LCD”) devices and products containing the same which allegedly infringe certain claims of U.S.… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
 Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”), Research In Motion, Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In Order No. 44, ALJ Charneski granted Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:38 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the order, Spansion moved to compel Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (“Samsung”) to respond to discovery regarding the full scope of the accused products in the investigation. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:46 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Spansion moved to compel Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (“Samsung”) to produce a corporate representative to provide deposition testimony regarding a number of identified deposition topics. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
As to related litigation, AUO states that the ‘955 and ‘093 patents are currently the subject of a declaratory judgment action that was filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on June 1, 2011 in the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) have already paid $964 million in settlements to Kodak for using the technology. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) have already paid $964 million in settlements to Kodak for using the technology. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 pm by Alex Gasser
Patent Nos. 5,926,636 (the ‘636 patent), 5,929,655 (the ‘655 patent), 6,208,879 (the ‘879 patent), and 6,456,841 (the ‘841 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In support of its motion, Spansion relied upon the deposition testimony of Complainant Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. [read post]