Search for: "Selective Insurance Company v. Goings" Results 261 - 280 of 519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement, who also represents the insurance companies that are among the appealing parties in the “Ponzi scheme” case. [read post]
RAIKA argued that the court had no jurisdiction because the company was immune to suit under the FSIA and that the forum was improper because a prior agreement between the parties contained a forum selection clause for England. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Going green (Spicy IP)   Israel An ill wind. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
So the insurance industry convinced Congress that they needed an offset in order to avoid adverse selection, and that offset is the mandate. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm by Francis Pileggi
Travis Laster’s ruling that state corporation law prohibits companies from adopting federal forum selection provisions for Securities Act litigation. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
As the authors note, the decision has important implications for companies and their D&O insurers, as well as for claims going forward. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
  She claims that the same cancer drug treatment should have cost the plan approximately $40,000 by going out of network, but the plan administrator told her that “saving money is not a reason to go out of network. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Too many companies use process based decisions to conduct technology selection, when they should be focusing on end result goals. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
Arbitration agreement’s limitations on choice of arbitrator AMERICO LIFE, INC., AMERICO FINANCIAL LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE OHIO STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL FARMERS UNION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm by TDot
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:36 am by Michael Scutt
  The contract is between the employer and the insurance company and not with the employee, although it may be possible for the employee to assert their rights if the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 applies. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by INFORRM
In other words, the losers in this case are lawyers and insurance companies. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by S2KM Limited
"We’ve hit a home run for consumers,” announced Peter V. [read post]