Search for: "Self v. Baker" Results 261 - 280 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  One of the benefits of the learned intermediary rule is that it replaces self-interested plaintiffs with highly trained medical professionals when it comes to warnings, and in particular with respect to warning causation. [read post]
5 May 2013, 3:41 pm by familoo
Baker J on the rare cases that must go outside of 26 weeks here in Devon CC v EB & Ors [2013] EWHC 968 (Fam). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
Yesterday, CAAF issued its decision in Center for Constitutional Rights v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
In this case there were cooking facilities in both flats, no doubt at least one set of facilities would be shared.While Langford Property Co Ltd v Goldrich [1949] 1 KB 511 was a Rent Act case, on whether two self-contained flats let together could amount to ‘a separate dwelling house’. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
In this case there were cooking facilities in both flats, no doubt at least one set of facilities would be shared.While Langford Property Co Ltd v Goldrich [1949] 1 KB 511 was a Rent Act case, on whether two self-contained flats let together could amount to ‘a separate dwelling house’. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is “inadequate” or “irrelevant” in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; Gjelten, 2010). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Drone’s influential 1879 treatise endorsed Drury as the way to go, so when the SCt reversed in Baker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
Baker et al., [1976] 1 SCR 254, at page 260], depending on the representations made to the child, but the drafting lawyer will likely be making this argument on his or her own. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
"From a kind of self-interest of the hospital, it seems if you're a marginally capitalized hospital barely making it, it would be perfectly rational not to buy insurance," said Tom Baker, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania who has written about malpractice insurance. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
The second of the new issues that arose deals with the line of cases after the 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]