Search for: "Self v. Self" Results 261 - 280 of 19,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Ezra Rosser
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:56 am by INFORRM
On 1 February 2012, in their judgment in the case of Coogan and Phillips v NGN and Mulcaire  ([2012] EWCA Civ 48) the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions put to him by the two claimants. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
  Here is the abstract:Traditional state v. state war is largely a relic. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am by Sander van Rijnswou
According to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 6(1) ECHR, only under very exceptional circumstances a notice of self-recusation shall not lead to a replacement (cf., inter alia, European Court of Human Rights, Rudnichenko v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
This case is important for interpreting all treaties, including the extent to which they will be treated by courts as self-executing or not. [read post]
COVID-19 has driven up anxieties and everyday challenges for everyone, but for the self-represented litigant, it has raised new and especially difficult issues. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by James Maxeiner
To the relief of many, last year in Turner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 12:47 pm
  No real split in the lower courts.This seems one of those cases.Do we really care whether it counts as "insurance" for A-1 Self Storage to offer to charge $10/month so that the first $2500 in damages to stored items are covered? [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 10:52 am by Glenn Reynolds
DAMON ROOT: Civil Rights and Armed Self-Defense: Understanding Clarence Thomas’ extraordinary concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]