Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 261 - 280 of 23,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
She focuses on the misunderstanding of the CJEU's YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 judgment in the decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo and RTI v V Kontakte; for example, the Rome Court misunderstood that YouTube concerned primary, not secondary, liability of of a platform operator, and unduly reduced the guidance in YouTube to a formal (and empty) checklist. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by Mario Zúñiga
The report does mention selling through social media, but does not include it in the relevant market. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L.… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am by Eric Fruits
These stations rightly saw CATV providing “out of market” signals as competition for viewers and advertising, as discussed in Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Pixels sells the exact same products – prints, phone cases, drinkware, and stickers. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:40 am by Unknown
“A lockup period prevented insiders and early investors from selling unregistered shares acquired before the public offering. [read post]