Search for: "Senat v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 11,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Critics have noted that the proponents of this theory argue that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are “Officers of the United States. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
Term Limits v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Federal Jurisdiction and the Limited Liability Company: Should the Diversity Statute be Amended?
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  Given these concerns, in the original version of the LLC Act, which had passed the New York State Assembly and Senate, there was a requirement that beneficial ownership information be made publicly available through a database. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Beyond the Bench: Insights into the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Taylor Gulatsi
Written by Mark V. [read post]
In Custodia Legis - http://blogs.loc.gov/law
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Woman sues South Carolina over 6-week abortion ban after traveling to North Carolina to obtain an aboriton
6 Feb 2024, 9:34 am by Mahjabeen Khan | Vermont Law & Graduate School, US
She brings this suit along with Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT) against the state because of its alleged ambiguous language in  Senate Bill 474 (SB 474), also known as the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection that Enforcing Section Three is "Undemocratic"
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court to decide whether insurrection provision keeps Trump off ballot
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
The bar on service can only be overcome by a two-thirds vote of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Interim Post: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t Address
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
M'Clung v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/