Search for: "Shane v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2022, 9:16 am by Katherine Pompilio
  The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S. government in FBI v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
First, Shane Burke explores a variety of law-based works, where intellectual property law serves as either a medium of expression or a driving force behind the expression. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:59 am by Emily Dai
Dawn Zoldi wrote about the case RaceDayQuads v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Shane Harris of the Daily Beast notes that the dump “had no obvious public policy value” while Foreign Policy tells us the release was a “snoozefest. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  The district court also stated that the evidence failed to “conclusively” sever the link between the alleged misstatements and Goldman Sachs’s stock price. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” The Daily Beast’s Shane Harris sheds light on the “baffled” U.S. response to the crash in light of the “absence of any definitive evidence. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Ritika Singh
The NRA has filed this amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]