Search for: "Sharp v. E "
Results 261 - 280
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
., Thomas E. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:36 pm
In today’s case (Roed v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:45 am
Copyright office, however, there is no sharp distinction between works of performance art and the performing arts. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
He reserved judgment for a short period, handing it down on Wednesday 21 January 2015 ([2015] EWHC 77 (QB)) On 21 January 2015, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Murray v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:56 am
Sharpe and E. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Sharpe. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
In Hening v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
” Offering yet another perspective, Justice Neil Gorsuch pointed to an earlier case (Gobeille v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:32 pm
North Highland, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:32 pm
North Highland, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
A few sharp legal observers have suggested, in advance, that in one pending case, Welch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
The post highlights the need to be aware of the e-Privacy Regulation and the additional regulatory burden this would impose come 2019. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
On 12 May 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of Suresh v Samad & ors. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
As the Delhi High Court found in Naz Foundation v Government of NCT of India (“Naz Foundation”), the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, even where not enforced, serve to ‘entrenc[h] stigma and encourag[e] discrimination in different spheres of life’, exposing India’s LGBTQ community to ‘harassment, blackmail, extortion and discrimination’ (Naz Foundation at [50]). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
As the Delhi High Court found in Naz Foundation v Government of NCT of India (“Naz Foundation”), the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, even where not enforced, serve to ‘entrenc[h] stigma and encourag[e] discrimination in different spheres of life’, exposing India’s LGBTQ community to ‘harassment, blackmail, extortion and discrimination’ (Naz Foundation at [50]). [read post]
