Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 2,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
The AmeriKat hiding from work-relatedintruders in the Castello's gardenRight at the end of July, came big news from the Irish Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd 2019 IESC 65. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am by SHG
Board of Education, on the constitutionality of racial segregation in state school systems; and a memorandum on a federal case, Bolling v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
State, 714 P.2d 1176, 1180 (Wash. 1986) (en banc); Univ. of Minn. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:36 am by David Markus
You have these dueling canons, and you have a rule that when the government sends somebody to jail for 10 years, it has to cross sharp corners. [read post]