Search for: "Short v. Downs"
Results 261 - 280
of 8,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Now, when the opinion came down, I was just nine votes short of a unanimous result—(Laughter.) for—for my client. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
Roberts quipped that in the earlier case the final result, when the opinions came down, was that Roberts was left “just nine votes short of a unanimous result. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
"Is the EU doubling down on a deadly, failed migration strategy? [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:28 am
In short, yes. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
On 12 October 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in Cooper v Evans & Anor [2023] EWHC 2555 (KB) in favour of the defendants. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
Brownell, 88 F.3d 1511, 1523-24 (8th Cir. 1996) (striking down a requirement of 5 days' notice); Grossman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
This post is the concluding essay by the authors for a symposium published over at the Balkinization blog on the topic of “The Chevron Doctrine through the Lens of Comparative Law. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:26 am
Moody and NetChoice v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
To cut a longer decision short: the PRJ subsequently found that the skilled person would not arrive at the claimed invention starting from the closest prior art. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:09 am
TGK Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on The Chevron Doctrine through the Lens of Comparative LawSusan Rose-Ackerman & Oren Tamir Over the past two weeks, the Balkinization blog hosted a wide-ranging symposium about judicial deference to the statutory interpretations of administrative agencies (or the executive more broadly) around the world. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:46 am
The case is State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
See Woodworth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
For example, in a few short paragraphs on judicial supremacy, Michelman writes that: “[S]haring of constitutional-interpretive authority can occur through remedial devices such as judicial remands to political branches; through judicial abstentions from rulings on matters or in causes classed as non-justiciable; and through a judicial and a general public posture of (widely) bounded tolerance for constitutional interpretive disagreement — all without unacceptable… [read post]
